Memento is a violent, physical complicated film, about a man called Leonard who is looking for revenge on his wife’s killer. Leonard has a mental illness which means he has no short term memory. During the film he comes across a suspicious but helpful man called Teddy who is in the wrong place at the wrong time. A woman called Natalie who uses Leonard’s disability to her advantage. However this film is no original film as the narrative is backwards.
My first impressions of the film were good. It started with gun shots and death. From the way the main character (Leonard) acted and looked, the audience could tell straight away that he had problems. Scruffy clothes, hair, and a dirty suit showed that he hadn’t had time to clean. One of the first words of his killer is, “you don’t know who you are”. This also shows that Leonard is not in a sane state. From the first scene the audience was unable to see that the narrative was backwards. However as the next scene came around the person Leonard killed (Teddy) was still alive. However it didn’t state this in the film so it brought confusion to the audience.
The film is full of violent and disturbing scenes and images. Fights, chases, gun shootings and car chases throughout the film make it a violent action film. The first scene was Teddy being shot by Leonard. At first I was a bit fazed by the violent scene. However as the film progressed and more violence was included, I almost expected more violence out of the film. This made me less fazed and less bothered by the images on the screen. This is a lot like what the effect theory ‘Desensitisation’ is about. Because I was seeing so much violence I was becoming less sensitive to the violence. For other people these may make then less sensitive to real life violence. This is what gives the film a 15 certificate as a younger person may not have the knowledge to understand that the images they are seeing on the screen is wrong, therefore they may carry out these actions in real life. This is called the ‘copy cat’ theory. Therefore this theory also applies in the film.
I believe this film appeals to the audience because the audience understand why the character Leonard wants revenge. Everyone can understand his pain and misery for the loss of his loved one, and the reasoning for the hatred against his wife’s killer. This idea comes under ‘personal identity’ that is part of the ‘uses and gratifications’. This is because we can communicate with Leonard and understand his state of mind. This film also draws the audience’s attention because the narrative is going backwards. This means that audience is confused throughout the film, which keeps the audience focused. And intrigued to see how the film pans out.
A review about Memento said, ‘Superbly mind draining’. This means that the film made this person focus and draw all its attention on the film. I would agree with this because as soon as you take your mind of the film you lose the plot of the film. This is because of the narrative, which turns the film into a jigsaw which is never complete until the final scene. Most of the reviews rated the film highly and suggested it to others. This proves the, ‘two step flow theory’. This argument states that the media is not experienced in isolation and that conversations, articles, advert etc. about the media have more influence on potential behaviour than the original media. I agree with the first review as the film does keep you stuck and concentrated on the film. I believe the director’s idea of putting the film backwards is original, which is good because all audiences like a change.
During the film the audience become part of Leonard’s fight to find revenge of his wife’s life. The whole audience are on his side, and believe that they would be in the same state of mind if they lost their loved one. However as the film unwinds towards the end of the film the audiences perception is changed dramatically, as the end of the film reveals a shocking end, and it becomes clear that Leonard is a twisted killer. This then leaves the audience thinking about his metal illness and whether he knows what he is doing. This leaves the film in the head of the audience after the film is finished, which gets people talking about the film to others, which leads them to watch the film. Talking about the film afterwards improved my knowledge of the film. Its short twisted scenes also add confusion to the audience which adds uncertainties to the audiences understanding of the film.
I believe the theories that are most related to the films are:
· Desensitisation- as the film is full of violence and occurs throughout the film. Towards the end the violence becomes less shocking and the audience becomes less sensitive towards the violence. This may lead to the audience being less affected by real life violence.
· Copy cat theory- because there are no consequences for Leonard’s actions throughout the film. This may lead to the younger age group to believing that it is ok to do what Leonard is doing throughout the film. This may be the same for some mentally unstable people.
· Personal identity- as people are able to relate to Leonard which means more people will watch and buy the film. This also makes people feel emotionally involved with the film.
· Two step flow theory- because the film is very intelligent which keeps the audience concentrated on the film. This also creates lots of ideas in the audiences head and keeps them talking about it after the film is finished.
My overall opinion of the film is good, and I will suggest it to others. I like the film because it is like no other film I have seen in the past.